Good luck with your non homogeneous society

0 examples of them working long term

how long term does it need to be?

no government will stand for a long time

Governments, or Society? China has always been Chinese. Japan has always been Chinese. England has always been English yes, yes even with the 2% Nordic influence. France has always been friends. Governments change within a society.

So China may have become a dystopian hell hole, but still homogenously Chinese. Big win.I really don’t see what you gain if you maintain ethnic purity in your country but the system you live under happens to be shit.

^^^^^^^^^

And yeah, the American system isn’t a natural state. It takes work to maintain it. There’s a reason people Have to fight for it.

but worth it

I don't see anywhere else around here with free speech and a right to bear arms

anything worth having requires work, why else did it take ages until we got the the point where 90% of all people on earth aren't starving

Because the United States is exporting mass amounts of food

Because of European ingenuity in agriculture

Because of capitalistic business practices

There's correlation to all of these things

The success of the Western World being exported on to the rest of the planet is responsible for every single countries upcoming currently. There is not a single country brought into the First World by itself without influence of European and American outreach.

Where are the boundaries of "whiteness"?
And do you mean culturally homogenous or within a degree of genetic variance?

whiteness is anyone who disagrees on anything of substance with the left

hence "Dave Chappelle is a white supremacist" take

:^)

They say he's a white supremacist because he said he's not a nigger

Hypothetical: let's say someone makes a white ethnostate and they only let in whites. Without getting into the the nitty gritty of "what is white," would they let someone in who is 100% European ethnic white but who staunchly disagrees with the premise of a white ethnostate? If they let in all whites regardless of ideology/beliefs, then they openly invite political and cultural dissension into their "purity" but if they only let in whites whose ideology/beliefs align with the ethnostate (which is more likely imo), then they are admitting that ideology is more important than race when it comes to stability of the state.

Technically they are admitting that it's *equally* important.

fair enough

at the very least, equally important if not 1% more so

kek

It doesn't seem to me like it makes much of a difference. If you blather on about how things would be so much better if only people of #therace were allowed to live here, and it came out that you actually only wanted people of the right race and the right ideology, you are still a hypocrite, and kind of a piece of shit.

Yeah totally makes you a piece of shit just want to live amongst a homogeneous society. I guess the entire world is a piece of shit.

probz

Funny how people Within diverse communities still go to churches that are entirely their own race, isn't it

idk my church isn't funny

Kinda funny that you take issue with the claim that it's shitty, but not that it's hypocritical.

It's not as if everyone that goes to church goes to one that is only their own race. And it's not even as if everyone that goes to a church that is only their own race goes to that church because it's racially segregated

when i look for a new church, I look for a lack of black and brown people

What about Asians?

yellow fever

Asians go to their own churches

Blacks their own

Whites their own

I mean, I have anecdotal evidence that isn't 100% true

Go outside and look