Message from @nadrud
Discord ID: 637110741672919050
yep
@nadrud 400 miles covers the majority of refer loads, especially for line hauls a la Walmart.
we all know
we all saw the video
no one cares
we are being nice
Idk what video.
to not to tell you to stfu
its not part of the convo
im sorry
I don't consume much video content.
but you kept going on about electric trucks
because i think youre fixating on the ultraspecifics of yangs original example, not the broader concept of what hes saying is happening
thats what i was talking about
but 1000 a month isn't a fix
its just a 1 2 punch to the low iq voter in america
@CCRed95 the broader specifics? Like his timeline is too short? Or he doesn't address the specifics of entrenched interests?
no totally, his solution is wrong but hes identified the right problem
hes not behing honest
hes focusing the problem in the wrong direction
No, we are going to have to form a new relationship to economy that recognizes that the formal labor force will shrink while overall wealth will go up.
No no that technology is destroying the american workforce for the bottom 50% of the workforce
He's the only candidate that's addressed the sex specific effects of unemployment or what happens when broad swaths of automation make that happen. Rail would be 90% automated except for unions.
i think we need to establish laws such as, robots are not allowed to repair other robots...
simple as that
lol
god laws
seriously
Might as well shoot coders.
Six of one ..
I hope that was a joke nadrud.
not at all
No offense but that is a ridiculous proposal.
why would you like to lose control?
I'm not in the yang gang, it's just exciting that someone on the stage is talking about something other than genitals and melatonin
Melanin
you can use "robots" like assembly line, but not ai
dont allow them to advance
on the line we created
>Implying we will know how to run an airplane in 100 years