I don't consume much video content.

but you kept going on about electric trucks

because i think youre fixating on the ultraspecifics of yangs original example, not the broader concept of what hes saying is happening

thats what i was talking about

but 1000 a month isn't a fix

its just a 1 2 punch to the low iq voter in america

@CCRed95 the broader specifics? Like his timeline is too short? Or he doesn't address the specifics of entrenched interests?

no totally, his solution is wrong but hes identified the right problem

hes not behing honest

hes focusing the problem in the wrong direction

to gain attention

No, we are going to have to form a new relationship to economy that recognizes that the formal labor force will shrink while overall wealth will go up.

No no that technology is destroying the american workforce for the bottom 50% of the workforce

He's the only candidate that's addressed the sex specific effects of unemployment or what happens when broad swaths of automation make that happen. Rail would be 90% automated except for unions.

i think we need to establish laws such as, robots are not allowed to repair other robots...

simple as that

lol

god laws

seriously

Might as well shoot coders.

Six of one ..

I hope that was a joke nadrud.

not at all

No offense but that is a ridiculous proposal.

why would you like to lose control?

I'm not in the yang gang, it's just exciting that someone on the stage is talking about something other than genitals and melatonin

Melanin

you can use "robots" like assembly line, but not ai

dont allow them to advance

on the line we created

>Implying we will know how to run an airplane in 100 years

So you want to cripple the US economy as the rest of the world ignores those rules and sails to insane levels of wealth.

take a moment before commenting

@nadrud RFID tag parts with wear sensors and it can be simpler than skyrims ai

im not crippling anything

is that any more crippling than a union that forces guy A to carry the door and guy B to carry the hindges?

please

AI and ML are largely intent based coding. the concept of robot takeovers is so retarded lol it would require that the AI/ML devs literally just had zero protections on the ML evolution's path and they just forgot to add the ability to guide the behavior after the fact lol

dont insult me

But I don't think that would be cost effect use of capital beyond super shops that process hundreds of rigs a week

its not a takeover