Identity of the sentence is the material conditional

with the sentence as the antecedent

check out that truth table lmao, we get circular reasoning

It's sound check out Curry's paradox, it's an example of it.

no circularity

imagine appealing to paradoxical syllogisms for justification lmao

cmon lil goof

what's eating @ u?

paradox still valid

not in terms of soundness

Perfectly sound

do you find paradoxical arguments sound?

how is a = if a then b sound?

Antecedent is an assertion about the entire sentence (conditional)

that's a condition of validity

as in that makes it invalid? @「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0

i'm talking about soundness

the idea is about the truth of premises

Entire thing is sound. Only thing in question is
A equivalent to A > B and that's accomplished with self reference.

I have my justification

how is it sound if the thing we're appealing to is self-referential?

self reference is not unsound

@Sjruruchunchun

how is it sound when self-reference has an undefined truth value?

shhh

rekt you have no justification

now you're on discord forever

never gonna let my marcgoof go

Let me be a trivialist with Curry's

what

@Sjruruchunchun no

@muhahahahe he's just going to give nonsense

@Marcdoof I watched a video detailing substructural logic as a way of mitigating the paradox.

But it results in the complete destruction of how we use language.

<:watching:644902704388505611>

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 come back Methode wants chill

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 methode calls you

I don't know who Toms is and I am very confused

Tom's server is dead now.

Just a few barnicles