「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0

Discord ID: 180146181534384128


97 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1

@Deleted User did you know that @Marcdoof has a worldview in which he is ok with us Jews are lizard people trying to control the world?

durgen is to thank for this

wtf does it mean for A = A -> B

check out that truth table lmao, we get circular reasoning

imagine appealing to paradoxical syllogisms for justification lmao

do you find paradoxical arguments sound?

how is a = if a then b sound?

that's a condition of validity

i'm talking about soundness

the idea is about the truth of premises

how is it sound if the thing we're appealing to is self-referential?

how is it sound when self-reference has an undefined truth value?

rekt you have no justification

now you're on discord forever

never gonna let my marcgoof go

p1: taking something from a person who was poor and became rich is unfair
p2: in the case in which a poor person is made rich from stolen goods, it is fair to take it from them
p3: by p1, it should be unfair to take something from this poor-turned-rich person
conclusion: p1 and p2 contradict

methode i think is making a case for when the animal has language

DESTROY THIS SERVER, MINIONS

@sydtko fuck i wasn't checking the tumeric index

also shame on ya'll for your treatment of syllogisms

you said you were getting me evidence for the claim you made that the war and subsequent occupation were good for our economy

now you're backing off that claim?

that's the empirics i'm looking for

and you said it was something easy to find

so this is the evidence that the iraq war was good for our economy?

that's fine if you are backing off the claim you made, which was the interesting part

the claim i made was that us intervention was a primary cause of instability in the middle east and one of the things i cited, besides lets say the coups and embargos and etc, was like the iraq war; you made the claim that it was the pullout that was the real cause and that this shift from 'intervention' to 'pullout' is such that it we cannot predicate blame on the united states for the instability that followed, do i have this correct?

i just realised that this is too much of an indepth discussion involving everything from embargoes to wars, so instead i'll just keep this conceptually simple:
the united states was instrumental and causal to major regime changes that resulted in massive economic instability along with domestic instability, wich had effects along the lines of unemployment and conflict and because of our background information we can say that the united states's foriegn policy decision, such as forced regime changed, to be either causal to general instability or at least an inhibiter for stability

otherwise they will get confused

97 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1