Message from @「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0
Discord ID: 651929406968954883
@muhahahahe where are the sunnis
@ᏉᎬᏁus ( ᵘ ᵕ ᵘ ⁎) they hiding from you
@ᏉᎬᏁus ( ᵘ ᵕ ᵘ ⁎) accurate
@「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 its a brute fact nothing more can be said
🆙 | **monerty leveled up!**
Level 31
The P O W E R
@Deleted User its a brute fact that he wants to leave theres nothing more to be said
@LustrousMandrill whats your power level
Like level 5 or something, I use VC way more than text
How do I check my level
If this sentence is true [A] then Marcdoof leaving discord is justified (B).
**A = A->B** (if this sentence is true, then B )
1. A -> A (asm)
2. A -> ( A -> B ) ( 1, sub)
3. A -> B (2, contraction)
4. A (3, Sub)
5. B (4, MP)
@「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0
wtf does it mean for A = A -> B
that seems circular
It's self reference
Identity of the sentence is the material conditional
with the sentence as the antecedent
It's sound check out Curry's paradox, it's an example of it.
no circularity
imagine appealing to paradoxical syllogisms for justification lmao
cmon lil goof
what's eating @ u?
paradox still valid
not in terms of soundness
Perfectly sound
do you find paradoxical arguments sound?
how is a = if a then b sound?
Antecedent is an assertion about the entire sentence (conditional)
that's a condition of validity
as in that makes it invalid? @「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0
i'm talking about soundness
the idea is about the truth of premises
Entire thing is sound. Only thing in question is
A equivalent to A > B and that's accomplished with self reference.
I have my justification
how is it sound if the thing we're appealing to is self-referential?
self reference is not unsound