Message from @sydtko

Discord ID: 662836904424898591


2020-01-04 01:33:43 UTC  

If you can reference it, it necessarily exists, but not in the same sense

2020-01-04 01:33:51 UTC  

So you equivocating "exist" or "existence"

2020-01-04 01:33:57 UTC  

But I don't particularly care

2020-01-04 01:34:38 UTC  

@Deleted User do you believe there are physical properties but not not physical substances?

2020-01-04 01:35:08 UTC  

@Deleted User How do you know other things are non mental?

2020-01-04 01:35:28 UTC  

Substance is a red herring, the substance is irrelevant if you ask me

2020-01-04 01:35:54 UTC  

Can't know the thing-in-itself, no way to demonstrate things without relations, blah blah

2020-01-04 01:36:11 UTC  

Leads to you shouldn't speak about a substance... aside that there is something

2020-01-04 01:36:26 UTC  

You can call it neutral monism, an idea, physical (any semantic name, via nominalism)

2020-01-04 01:37:30 UTC  

I'm insanely triggered by the disbelief in ...
Holism or unity of all things though

2020-01-04 01:37:42 UTC  

You necessarily must make a trivial statement for axiom...
Like the law of identity

2020-01-04 01:37:45 UTC  

It's a trivial statement

2020-01-04 01:37:53 UTC  

For any and every X, X = X

2020-01-04 01:38:25 UTC  

So it seems like to excise the most semantics, it follows that you say
For any and every X, they are (semantic placeholder) [idea, physical...] yada yada

2020-01-04 01:38:29 UTC  

So that you maintain consistency

2020-01-04 01:39:24 UTC  

Physicalism = naturalism = etc

2020-01-04 01:40:32 UTC  

The laws of gravity is a name... it's a principle for another thing... a sense and understanding of things about the world... all of which is physical

2020-01-04 01:40:42 UTC  

A name is physical...

2020-01-04 01:56:46 UTC  

I am a very angry impatient individual

2020-01-04 01:57:06 UTC  

So there's no world where I extend charity to Solo past about ... 3 questions

2020-01-04 01:57:12 UTC  

And he didn't answer question 1

2020-01-04 01:57:21 UTC  

Jews overrepresented

2020-01-04 01:59:20 UTC  

@Deleted User There is some polling that implies women were happier about 30-40 years ago

2020-01-04 02:00:29 UTC  

But I don't want to link it for the idea that...
I don't want to provide evidence for someone I dislike and corroborate some of their claim

2020-01-04 02:01:09 UTC  

How anti-intellectual of you

2020-01-04 02:01:34 UTC  

It's not anti-intellectual per se. I have the article open on hand. I just don't know the intent / goal of this discourse

2020-01-04 02:01:55 UTC  

To shit on the nazi. Or to get get at truth (or truthlikeness)

2020-01-04 02:02:00 UTC  

Verisimilitude

2020-01-04 02:02:10 UTC  

I literally have the article open

2020-01-04 02:02:15 UTC  

I think the goal would depend on who you ask

2020-01-04 02:02:19 UTC  

Exactly

2020-01-04 02:02:23 UTC  

Which is the problem

2020-01-04 02:02:42 UTC  

As I don't know the goal/intent, I can't know if I should or should not post evidence of his claim

2020-01-04 02:03:22 UTC  

And I personally don't like helping people I don't like...

2020-01-04 02:03:38 UTC  

At face value, I dislike Solo

2020-01-04 02:04:57 UTC  

If someone asks a vague question like "ancestor" you can easily just face value answer "Africa"

2020-01-04 02:05:09 UTC  

Or "The ocean"

2020-01-04 02:05:21 UTC  

I just personally hate when leftists make themselves look bad by "shitting on nazis" without even pretending to care about genuinely trying to have a productive conversation

2020-01-04 02:05:55 UTC  

It's discord... I don't think there's really anything productive about it except personal entertainment...
And if I actually did things that were "productive" likely they would also be immoral

2020-01-04 02:06:19 UTC  

I don't see how anyone gains anything from this kind of discourse

2020-01-04 02:06:30 UTC  

Personal entertainment?