poland is pretty not communist

this is emotivism as well

noncog and emotivism gang is just correct <:Smug:643129431434461194>

@Sasha It's called the embedding problem

Is vs as incoherent

@Sasha I don't agree to that

Linguistics do not determine reality... except feeding back on it by impacting our understanding of it

Which is why I'm a linguistic trivialist...
You can call X true of false, it changes nothing about X'ness. It changes your sense of X

Metaphysical trivialism... I might be less willing to jump on board

Since I could only explain that with the phenomenon is a output of the contradictory...
Or thing in itself is nothing. X + not X = object...
I am unwilling to commit to that. Since it's mere possibility

Propositions are non physical <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>

dualism is cringe

@Deleted User It's not a contradiction if it is the case there is a fact of the matter

So it's like saying ... I believe there's a galaxy a thousand light years away

There is a fact of the matter there

Despite not having a referent on hand...

So you're proper or correct in believing it

@LustrousMandrill A meinongian

If you can reference it, it necessarily exists, but not in the same sense

So you equivocating "exist" or "existence"

But I don't particularly care

@Deleted User do you believe there are physical properties but not not physical substances?

@Deleted User How do you know other things are non mental?

Substance is a red herring, the substance is irrelevant if you ask me

Can't know the thing-in-itself, no way to demonstrate things without relations, blah blah

Leads to you shouldn't speak about a substance... aside that there is something

You can call it neutral monism, an idea, physical (any semantic name, via nominalism)

I'm insanely triggered by the disbelief in ...
Holism or unity of all things though

You necessarily must make a trivial statement for axiom...
Like the law of identity

It's a trivial statement

For any and every X, X = X

So it seems like to excise the most semantics, it follows that you say
For any and every X, they are (semantic placeholder) [idea, physical...] yada yada

So that you maintain consistency

Physicalism = naturalism = etc

The laws of gravity is a name... it's a principle for another thing... a sense and understanding of things about the world... all of which is physical

A name is physical...

I am a very angry impatient individual

So there's no world where I extend charity to Solo past about ... 3 questions

And he didn't answer question 1

Jews overrepresented

@Deleted User There is some polling that implies women were happier about 30-40 years ago