Propositions are non physical <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>

dualism is cringe

@Deleted User It's not a contradiction if it is the case there is a fact of the matter

So it's like saying ... I believe there's a galaxy a thousand light years away

There is a fact of the matter there

Despite not having a referent on hand...

So you're proper or correct in believing it

@LustrousMandrill A meinongian

If you can reference it, it necessarily exists, but not in the same sense

So you equivocating "exist" or "existence"

But I don't particularly care

@Deleted User do you believe there are physical properties but not not physical substances?

@Deleted User How do you know other things are non mental?

Substance is a red herring, the substance is irrelevant if you ask me

Can't know the thing-in-itself, no way to demonstrate things without relations, blah blah

Leads to you shouldn't speak about a substance... aside that there is something

You can call it neutral monism, an idea, physical (any semantic name, via nominalism)

I'm insanely triggered by the disbelief in ...
Holism or unity of all things though

You necessarily must make a trivial statement for axiom...
Like the law of identity

It's a trivial statement

For any and every X, X = X

So it seems like to excise the most semantics, it follows that you say
For any and every X, they are (semantic placeholder) [idea, physical...] yada yada

So that you maintain consistency

Physicalism = naturalism = etc

The laws of gravity is a name... it's a principle for another thing... a sense and understanding of things about the world... all of which is physical

A name is physical...

I am a very angry impatient individual

So there's no world where I extend charity to Solo past about ... 3 questions

And he didn't answer question 1

Jews overrepresented

@Deleted User There is some polling that implies women were happier about 30-40 years ago

But I don't want to link it for the idea that...
I don't want to provide evidence for someone I dislike and corroborate some of their claim

How anti-intellectual of you

It's not anti-intellectual per se. I have the article open on hand. I just don't know the intent / goal of this discourse

To shit on the nazi. Or to get get at truth (or truthlikeness)

Verisimilitude

I literally have the article open

I think the goal would depend on who you ask

Exactly

Which is the problem

As I don't know the goal/intent, I can't know if I should or should not post evidence of his claim