I'm insanely triggered by the disbelief in ...
Holism or unity of all things though

You necessarily must make a trivial statement for axiom...
Like the law of identity

It's a trivial statement

For any and every X, X = X

So it seems like to excise the most semantics, it follows that you say
For any and every X, they are (semantic placeholder) [idea, physical...] yada yada

So that you maintain consistency

Physicalism = naturalism = etc

The laws of gravity is a name... it's a principle for another thing... a sense and understanding of things about the world... all of which is physical

A name is physical...

I am a very angry impatient individual

So there's no world where I extend charity to Solo past about ... 3 questions

And he didn't answer question 1

Jews overrepresented

@Deleted User There is some polling that implies women were happier about 30-40 years ago

But I don't want to link it for the idea that...
I don't want to provide evidence for someone I dislike and corroborate some of their claim

How anti-intellectual of you

It's not anti-intellectual per se. I have the article open on hand. I just don't know the intent / goal of this discourse

To shit on the nazi. Or to get get at truth (or truthlikeness)

Verisimilitude

I literally have the article open

I think the goal would depend on who you ask

Exactly

Which is the problem

As I don't know the goal/intent, I can't know if I should or should not post evidence of his claim

And I personally don't like helping people I don't like...

At face value, I dislike Solo

If someone asks a vague question like "ancestor" you can easily just face value answer "Africa"

Or "The ocean"

I just personally hate when leftists make themselves look bad by "shitting on nazis" without even pretending to care about genuinely trying to have a productive conversation

It's discord... I don't think there's really anything productive about it except personal entertainment...
And if I actually did things that were "productive" likely they would also be immoral

I don't see how anyone gains anything from this kind of discourse

Personal entertainment?

Anyhow. You seem like you do not like me withholding posts so https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf

```The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness*```

Googleable

It's something that is assertible ... I just don't know if I particularly care about women's happiness
While having less economic freedom

40 years ago, women has less economic freedom

Huh, maybe having more choices and responsibilities really do make people less happy

I'd believe that... but I would prefer them have more choices... to a point

Time to embrace the third position

Third position ? Not valuing happiness or freedom... or valuing both? <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>