"camps"

i am june

I think I just became a lesbian

Yeah, not in the mood to deal with that cancer

jesus christ

hang on, so should women not be whores? or have you fucked lots of women? @Webber

kill me

"Progressivism is the support for or advocacy of improvement of society by reform. "

what did I walk into?

"we've never experienced degeneracy" - said by the men who spent weeks carving perfect dicks into marble

my sides

The kumite

Seriously, what did I miss? because non of this makes sense

Enough degeneracy for today.

L8er

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_BeCthw3QhNDSLk-byHGkyaHQLBexCMl4jzz64JTN5k/edit?usp=sharing

https://archive.is/

😃

@Kelben where does that come from

I made it

I wanted to have a hard copy of a lot of different ideas that were spinning around in my head, and I figured that if I was going to write them down anyway I might as well write it as if it were a constitutional amendment.

@FroggyC ^^^^^^^^^^^

Thanks

The quorum on referenda will make actually passing a referendum nigh impossible

we have the same system in my country

I also don't really understand why limiting the President's power to define his or her cabinet that much

@Kelben

It's interesting tho

Thanks, the reason I limited the President's ability to create a cabinet is described in the fourth paragraph of section 19. Basically I'm using the Cabinet as a check on the President's ability to use executive orders, and so I need the Cabinet to not be loyal to the President but instead to congress, and by extension the people of the United States.

And as for the referendums, I am curious about which restriction specifically you think will make them impossible to pass?

@FroggyC ^^^^^^

The quorum

Aka needing the vote of 50%+1 of voters

It makes abstention = a no vote

So who's against the referendum will campaign for just not voting

Since a sizeable percentage of the people always not vote, you will end up with the referendum not passing having a significant headstart

About the cabinet. I understand what you're saying but it still needs to be expression of a single political line.
You might need the nominations to have a confirmation by the Senate, but you can't ask the Senate to pick them. It also would break separation of powers, making executive positions dependent on the legislative branch.

Even parliamentary democracies don't have ministers appointed by the upper house. The houses just give confidence

@Kelben ^^^^