Message from @nat
Discord ID: 343612738221899787
I think dabbing is good!!
It's not the most complicated question in the world. Do you think it is a good analysis of history and power constructs? Why/why not?
Marxism-Leninism is neither Marxist nor Leninist
I recommend you read Marx
Or lenin
haha
*facepalm*
haHAA
I recommend you anarkiddies read State and Revolution
Convert you to Marxism Leninism in one step
Okay, so Imma just count the questions and keep a tally of the things you need to answer
No, not at all. Marxism is dumb
define anrachism, please.
pretty simple honestly
"Anarchism means no rules hahahahaha xcddddhdhdhdh"
I asked them that on TCB server, they responded with the google dfinition
so they're probably gonna respond with my correction
Collective people's ownership without a state apparatus
No.
No
"They're"
lmao
What is a "state apparatus"?
Just no
I think there's one person here attacking the anarkiddies
And how do you have ownership without constructing an institution of coercion and compulsion?
Workers ownership
You can have worker ownership without a state
Never said you couldn't
I said it simply doesn't work without the state
However you define state, you need some coercive power to compel people to respect the owner's decisions regarding their property
>muh private property
The workers are the owner, get on my level
The workers of *what* get to own *what*?
@ego_sum_jeffum How so? Anarchist movements have been much more successful than authsoc ones, only reason they fell was because of suppression by Tankies and and fash
Does everyone own everything all at once?
Anarchist movement haven't been successful
@Katherine the workers control the means of production. In other words, the laborers in a factory own that factory, etc
Because they've never worked
Or were true anarchism