Because again, You're stretching no argument into a shit load of questions

No Im for saying anything as long as it doesn't directly harm a person. Nazi or not.

As if your questions are points in and of themselves

And that's not what we use

So I don't care what YOU say

I care abour how freedom of speech is applied

Yes it is you've even said so while listing out the laws

In the end the Nazis win, no point in trying to fight it anymore

No, but I havent

Tell that to ww2

Cause again,

You literally don't use free speech that way

WW2 was not the end for Nazism

Unless in an academic debate

It was the end for the 3rd Reich

In which case you'll pretend freedom of speech is somehow absolute

And again, the fact you make a caveat

PROVES

No I use it that way all the time. So do a lot of people I know.

Its not absolute

I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the reality and it's gauruntee under law

Fine. I'll agree then

That's what I thought

Natsoc is fobidden

there thats the official end of it

So back to my original point,

In what timeline?

Apparently silencing people makes you a nazi?

But either way it's still wrong to punch and silence a nazi after stating an opinion or speaking his mind

Join the nazi club

You silence people

No I dont

be a smarty

Or live in a society in which people are silenced

That you justify

Lmao silencing speech doesn't make you a nazi

come and join the nazi party

Because I forget You're somehow perfect

silencing people because they disagree with you is fascist

>when the lemmings think that the nazis actually lost the war

And have never partaken in limiting speech