Message from @Comrade Skeltal
Discord ID: 421042499998449664
@Mr.E#2794 I dont know
Point is your definition of free speech literally isnt the one we use
I'm not using semantics. You said You're so I assumed you were talking about me.
There can only be ONE free speech
No I mean you as a liberal
And you knew I did
Not some speech is free but some aint
Hence that's the context
Again, still not contending with every point in history and present day where we violate free speech based on legal considerations
Because again, You're stretching no argument into a shit load of questions
No Im for saying anything as long as it doesn't directly harm a person. Nazi or not.
As if your questions are points in and of themselves
And that's not what we use
So I don't care what YOU say
I care abour how freedom of speech is applied
Yes it is you've even said so while listing out the laws
In the end the Nazis win, no point in trying to fight it anymore
No, but I havent
Tell that to ww2
Cause again,
WW2 was not the end for Nazism
Unless in an academic debate
It was the end for the 3rd Reich
In which case you'll pretend freedom of speech is somehow absolute
And again, the fact you make a caveat
PROVES
No I use it that way all the time. So do a lot of people I know.
Its not absolute
I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the reality and it's gauruntee under law
Fine. I'll agree then
That's what I thought
Natsoc is fobidden
there thats the official end of it
So back to my original point,
In what timeline?
Apparently silencing people makes you a nazi?
But either way it's still wrong to punch and silence a nazi after stating an opinion or speaking his mind
Join the nazi club
You silence people
No I dont