Message from @Comrade Skeltal
Discord ID: 421051218790580224
It does justify Nazis be :punched", not literally
But in that they should be reprimanded
For hate speech
Not literally assaulted
Sure
Obviously keeping assault illegal is fine
Does anyone have the meme where the virgin trump supporter is like “but communism killed millions” then a guy in a tanks is like “and well kill millions more
But I'm using "punched" As a proxy for punishment
Could've made that clear but ok
They are punched right now because there is no legal punishment for them rallying with tiki torches
And preaching the death of minorities
I think yall are trying to compare vigilantee "justice" to legal punishment
Which is hate speech
There is
And it incites violence
But there isnt
We dont use it
At all
nazis get jailed all the time
For property crimes
Not hatespeech
They get charged when they murder someone with a car
Not when they come out and ask for the murder of people which results in a skirmish
And the death of someone
Hate speech shouldn't get you jailed
Yes but it should, Hence why you justify slander
And other limits to law
So I think you're arguing free speech vs hate speech?
Is what I'm arguing
*getting
From this
I'm arguing that exceptions to free speech exist,
As a rule of thumb,
That right now they exist to support capital
I'm saying hate speech is part of free speech
As a rule of thumb exceptions to everything exist
And that hate speech in the form of slander is already not part of free speech
Hence it being literally prosecutable
Yeah not part of your definition of free speech
And because their speech represents a literal threat to the speech of others