They are punched right now because there is no legal punishment for them rallying with tiki torches

And preaching the death of minorities

I think yall are trying to compare vigilantee "justice" to legal punishment

Which is hate speech

There is

And it incites violence

But there isnt

We dont use it

At all

nazis get jailed all the time

For property crimes

Or physical assault

Not hatespeech

They get charged when they murder someone with a car

Not when they come out and ask for the murder of people which results in a skirmish

And the death of someone

Hate speech shouldn't get you jailed

Yes but it should, Hence why you justify slander

And other limits to law

So I think you're arguing free speech vs hate speech?

Is what I'm arguing

*getting

From this

I'm arguing that exceptions to free speech exist,

As a rule of thumb,

That right now they exist to support capital

I'm saying hate speech is part of free speech

As a rule of thumb exceptions to everything exist

And that hate speech in the form of slander is already not part of free speech

Hence it being literally prosecutable

Yeah not part of your definition of free speech

And because their speech represents a literal threat to the speech of others

It should be punishable as well

And is under libel

Just not under Its own free standing law

Saying you dislike black people isn't a threat. Saying to kill them is.

Which they do

If I say "Im gonna bomb me school today" I'll prolly get arrested and charged terroristic threat

And don't get charged with hate speech

Some do. And they go to jail for it

They do