You'd agree with hate speech law

No

You can't have it both ways

At all

No because that's against the law

Assault is against the law

And it's wrong morally

I think yall are trying to argue different things

At this point

Stop saying its against the law, saying something is against the law doesbt make it anymore correct or morally wrong

Hush

I think so too

Law doesn't somehow justify itself

So stop

It is against the law though

I cant say "Its illegal cause it's illegal"

That's not a justification

Regardless as to whether it's illegal or not

There's a reason it's against the law to punch someone you don't agree with

The point is there is no such thing as absolute speech

And there is a reason that using slander is against the law

So your point is besides everything

Exceptions exist

I mean niggas are gonna judge and or act on whatever you say so anything could have consequences

Is that what you're saying?

I simply argue other exceptions exist

Fine lets say you're right then. That still doesn't justify nazis to be punched

It does justify Nazis be :punched", not literally

But in that they should be reprimanded

For hate speech

Not literally assaulted

Sure

Obviously keeping assault illegal is fine

Does anyone have the meme where the virgin trump supporter is like “but communism killed millions” then a guy in a tanks is like “and well kill millions more

But I'm using "punched" As a proxy for punishment

Could've made that clear but ok

They are punched right now because there is no legal punishment for them rallying with tiki torches

And preaching the death of minorities

I think yall are trying to compare vigilantee "justice" to legal punishment

Which is hate speech

There is