Message from @Comrade Skeltal
Discord ID: 421050406030934016
And are limited
I see
Why? Bevause they are exceptions
And because there are exceptions
Free speech isnt absolute
You can still say it but you're not devoid of the consequences as I said
And never has
Then you'd justify punching people or censoring hateful Nazis
You'd agree with hate speech law
No
You can't have it both ways
At all
No because that's against the law
Assault is against the law
And it's wrong morally
I think yall are trying to argue different things
At this point
Stop saying its against the law, saying something is against the law doesbt make it anymore correct or morally wrong
Hush
I think so too
So stop
It is against the law though
I cant say "Its illegal cause it's illegal"
That's not a justification
Regardless as to whether it's illegal or not
There's a reason it's against the law to punch someone you don't agree with
The point is there is no such thing as absolute speech
And there is a reason that using slander is against the law
So your point is besides everything
Exceptions exist
I mean niggas are gonna judge and or act on whatever you say so anything could have consequences
Is that what you're saying?
I simply argue other exceptions exist
Fine lets say you're right then. That still doesn't justify nazis to be punched
It does justify Nazis be :punched", not literally
But in that they should be reprimanded
For hate speech
Not literally assaulted
Sure
Obviously keeping assault illegal is fine