Its a matter of violence

You can disagree, but you're wrong

Plenty of imaginative people have peaceful solutions to problems they don't understand.

I disagree

It hasn't and won't happen

@Deleted User Im talking about those who do understand it though

What's stopping us?

And having an imagination doesn't somehow give you credence to peacefully topple a state

You've ascribed an arbitrary value

How isnt it?

To something not at all arbitrary

Stop asking questions, you said it did have something to do with it

@Mr. X If they understood the problem then they wouldn't be proposing unworkable solutions.

So prove it

And keep in mind the formula for toppling states exists, is taught,

It isnt something people imagine in every random case

Why? Because its not a matter of imagination >.>

@Deleted User No but one will and one might work

No it is

Planning has everything to do with imagination

well not everything but a lot atleast

Still ascribing random values

To things that aren't random at all

Sure but I'll be surprised

I dont see why you are doing this and ask that you stop. There is nothing explicit about toppling a state that means your have to have imagination

i ama agay

@Mr. X How can you make such an assumption?

And having imagination doesn't somehow intrinsically mean you can do it peacefully

@Deleted User Because its a matter of chance and humanity

You're asserting the impossible in an abstract vacuum in which you deny the very nature of the state

Y u do dis

and imagination of course

Im not denying what you think is the state

Not what I think is the state, what the state is,

And you are.

No.

I didnt disagree

@Mr. X What does that even mean? It means nothing.

I only disagreed to what little power you think people hold compared to the state

@Deleted User I disagree. It means a lot

I dont think they hold little power, I said that power isnt of a nonviolent nature.