Message from @Comrade Skeltal
Discord ID: 425837226472243201
Because its antithetical to the purpose of the state
We only went to the moon a handful of times
People thought it impossible
The state in and of itself is an embodiment of violence
but humans amazed themselves
How it shows it existence
Is violence
Just because something is violent doesnt mean you have to fight fire with fire
It responds, via violence
because chances are you'd lose
It means you will eventually be drawn to violence
Just look at happened with the general strikes in France. 11 million workers. They ended up getting shut down by the military.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1968_events_in_France
Not if you know an alternate solution
The only time transitions happen is when enough of the population is either onboard and indifferent, and the military doesn't find common cause with the state
There are no alternate options
You're positing something that doesn't exist
Doesnt mean it wont
Only it does
Given the nature of opposing a state
It will inevitably respond to you with violence
Unless you fight it.
Someone with a good imagination would have a peaceful solution
No, they wouldn't
without the need of fighting
Even if they protested and someone else jumped in to fight them on their behalf
I disagree. We can do it without the need to fight.
Its a matter of violence
You can disagree, but you're wrong
Plenty of imaginative people have peaceful solutions to problems they don't understand.
I disagree
It hasn't and won't happen
@Deleted User Im talking about those who do understand it though
What's stopping us?
And having an imagination doesn't somehow give you credence to peacefully topple a state
You've ascribed an arbitrary value
How isnt it?
To something not at all arbitrary
Stop asking questions, you said it did have something to do with it
@Mr. X If they understood the problem then they wouldn't be proposing unworkable solutions.
So prove it