Eh, it would try to

it's hard to get right apparently

No it won't, it will create a red bureaucracy that becomes the new capitalist class, it could be even worse with the introduction of state capitalism like the USSR and China did. Bakunin foresaw this told Marx and warned about it in his writing and despite all of that it still happened. States are oppressive and the working class cannot be free under one.

Federative, grass roots, direct democratic structures

So we democratize your workplace and then your workplace becomes a political organ for the new commune

you need a large international bureaucratic apparatus to deal with global issues though

perhaps even on a national scale

Not bureaucratic filled with career politicians, but delegates sent and elected from the working class themselves

they would be directly recallbale

Exactly why revolution

And when setting up a new system

You need specialists and state servants that are dedicate tho, you can't run a large apparatus like that without qualified officials

You do not want a large apparatus

the issue of corruption must be tackled effectively through control and transparency

No

yeah you don't want it but you NEED it

How do you need it?

how can your thousands of little councils deal with something like global warming?

something that requires global coordination and action?

or disasters of massive scales

They elect members from those councils to go to a regional council and the regional council elects someone to go to a national council and then they elect someone to go to international councils

but that is in effect a government body, and it needs a bureaucracy to function and implement its policies

A computer determining allocation of resources is not a state

and then you have a global bureaucratic organization run by representatives again

It is not a bureaucracy because people are directly elected and are recallable after the issue is done

computers cannot answer human questions and issues

Meaning they do not hold a permanent title

those people won't be able to do all the work

Then they can open up volunteer positions for working committees

they need expert advisers, bureaucrats to delegate work and research and to draft proposals

and oversee implementation

That can all be done by a working comittee working on one issue that dissolves after the issue

but that is extremely inefficient and disorganized

and you can't deal with urgent issues requiring immediate action well

Not really, it allows for the working class to directly elect who they want dealing with problems

Which issues?

you can't invent new processes and find and vet the right people at any given time easily

you need an institution of some sort i think

it should be controlled by the people of course

You do not vet or find

they come to the working group