using today measures dont mean they were capitalist

doesnt*

Read Marx

I don't think you understand the capitalist mode of production

oh and im sure that you know way better

It is literally the definition of the capitalist mode of production. He spent his entire life researching historical and dialectical materialism and documenting his findings.

"what do you mean a man who devoted his whole life to studying the material conditions of capitalism knows what capitalism is?"

>spending your life on something doesn't mean shit

okay

@PugSlugger I dont know what a bibile is, sorry mate

it wasnt because there were no capitalists

and no proletariat

and no philosophical base to capitalism

rome had slaves my dude

are you fucking stupid

you dont know what proletarians are

its not everyone who works you know

peasants are not proletarians in many cases

"marx was stupid! Why should I read his work?"
>can't define the term "proletariat" correctly

@PugSlugger I'm a Christian actually, so yeah, no.
Do you actually understand the definition of the proletariat?

Define Proletariat @PugSlugger

oh shit he's adding us to his cringe compilation

exactly

his

he prints how cringy he is

he takes screencaps of his own posts for his cringe compilation

the term had a different meaning shit head

many words adquire meanings

retard

"you're all retards"
*peak dunning-kruger*

>when you accuse the other side of damage control after calling everyone retarded

You sure showed those dumb commies!

linguistic doesnt change in some centuries amirite?

oh wait

who gives a fuck about how the romans spoke a language that DOES NOT EXIST TODAY?

why im not writing in saxon

ohhhhhhhhhhh

i think we found a fallacy

Roman economy was largely traditionalist, labor was not arbitrary or centered on creating products for exchange.

"they're called something that sounds like 'proletariat' so that makes them proletariat"
just like how the DPRK is a democratic people's republic