and no philosophical base to capitalism

rome had slaves my dude

are you fucking stupid

you dont know what proletarians are

its not everyone who works you know

peasants are not proletarians in many cases

"marx was stupid! Why should I read his work?"
>can't define the term "proletariat" correctly

@PugSlugger I'm a Christian actually, so yeah, no.
Do you actually understand the definition of the proletariat?

Define Proletariat @PugSlugger

oh shit he's adding us to his cringe compilation

exactly

his

he prints how cringy he is

he takes screencaps of his own posts for his cringe compilation

the term had a different meaning shit head

many words adquire meanings

retard

"you're all retards"
*peak dunning-kruger*

>when you accuse the other side of damage control after calling everyone retarded

You sure showed those dumb commies!

linguistic doesnt change in some centuries amirite?

oh wait

who gives a fuck about how the romans spoke a language that DOES NOT EXIST TODAY?

why im not writing in saxon

ohhhhhhhhhhh

i think we found a fallacy

Roman economy was largely traditionalist, labor was not arbitrary or centered on creating products for exchange.

"they're called something that sounds like 'proletariat' so that makes them proletariat"
just like how the DPRK is a democratic people's republic

It shared some features with capitalism but at it's core the difference is quite significant

every insume needs to be a commodity if a society is to be capitalistic

slavery can only coop with capitalism in the sense of the perifery

or third world

insane damage control

a ancient society used a word with a different meaning

on a different language

omg such disonesty and damage control

gomunism rekt

step 1: say something stupid
step 2: when people point out your stupidity, call it damage control
step 3: act like they're the stupid ones for not believing your stupid statement

You are the one ignoring any argument that contradicts your extremely plain statement

here he goes