Message from @CelestialMorningLight
Discord ID: 473447331606429696
But it's mostly stuff that is common sensr
*sense
He appeals a lot to common sense
Like telling people to clean their rooms
Rat strategt
Strategy*
Principally in politics and philosophy
He doesn't even have to form arguments
Just throw the common sense and it's all you need
He is good on psychology
Nah
Vygotsky is way better
Behaviorism and freudianism are shit
If he wasn't he wouldn't be one of if not the most cited psychologist today
That's a logical fallacy
Darwin was shunned by most of the media and institutions when his magnum opus came out
Does that mean he was a bad scientist?
No, but we aren't talking about what makes someone bad, we're talking about what makes someone good
This is valid the other way around
If not show why
Being highly cited is not a inherent quality
Things have ideological value
If they coop with the status quo they instantly get valued
Thomas Aquinas was highly cited in the intelectual circles at his time
I'm going to go ahead and leave, I'm half asleep and I haven't eaten so yea
Sorry
Ok
did he use his neighbor's wallet to pay for that graphic
Probably was photoshopped in but I’m no expert
I mean for the love of god
They wanted a big sounding number
Above and beyond the highest estimates. That is obviously terrible scholarship.
the black book authors actually talked about how they had to scrape together whatever they could to reach the 100 million figure
they started with "communism killed 100 million people" and then used whatever bullshit they could to try to """prove""" it
there goes hooty posting wikipedia again
Quiet impudent fool
"Well external factors only cause famine if policy is bad"
*posts wikipedia with no context*
"what the fuck"
"shut up"