@everyone

they live up to the age of 115 120

There is no better.

How are you able to use that feature?

There is a measure for a certain quality that may be met to provoke a certain action.

Well, we can't argue about that

It may exist or not

I place value on some things

You don't

Is not "better". When we say "better" we ask, better for who?

But in any case, give any criterion, and the degree to which populations live up to this criterion, will be unequal

Is it better for you?

It is not better for me.

So fuck you

I value health and long life, for example

For this reason I would rather be a Scandinavian than an African American

I do not care of your value

its subjective

Stuck it into your ass

All I care

@Firefly

Yes?

Have you no preference between intelligence and stupidity, between health and weakness, between long life and quick death?

@Hagel In abstract I do not. In instinct I do.

Well

Regardless of whether you have a preference, populations differ in ways such as these

Of course we can subdivide intelligence, and even in IQ tests, we see that populations with similar average scores, get their scores in different ways

some do well on the linguistic parts, others on the spatial parts

You talk like a bot. I already agreed with this point

Following your programm

Need to adjust

We've moved into the subjective realm of the mind, the domain of values

We can't argue any here

Yes we can

We can make our case to the people listening

and they can choose what appeals to them more

but we're not arguing about objective facts anymore

Values are not only subjective but also objective

some of the values are indeed subjective. Like yours