Oh wait

I think that IQ is a useful indicator

of meaningful things

I thought it was gonna be a VC debate

same @Deleted User 😦

@Hagel Is not important. The principal point "people are different" I agree with. What else?

They're also not equal. If you take any criterion, and compare different populations in it, you are likely to find that some are better (in that way), than other ones

Given this, they build different societies, and different cultures will emerge from them.

>you are likely to find that some are better (in that way)

"Better" is subjective category misused in the sentence.

It's subjective, but it's not misused

If you think that living longer is better than living shorter, for example,

then certain populations will be better off in this regard than other ones

I disagree

for example the okinawa people

@everyone

they live up to the age of 115 120

There is no better.

How are you able to use that feature?

There is a measure for a certain quality that may be met to provoke a certain action.

Well, we can't argue about that

It may exist or not

I place value on some things

You don't

Is not "better". When we say "better" we ask, better for who?

But in any case, give any criterion, and the degree to which populations live up to this criterion, will be unequal

Is it better for you?

It is not better for me.

So fuck you

I value health and long life, for example

For this reason I would rather be a Scandinavian than an African American

I do not care of your value

its subjective

Stuck it into your ass

All I care

@Firefly

Yes?

Have you no preference between intelligence and stupidity, between health and weakness, between long life and quick death?