Message from @Firefly
Discord ID: 496406438353043457
They're also not equal. If you take any criterion, and compare different populations in it, you are likely to find that some are better (in that way), than other ones
Given this, they build different societies, and different cultures will emerge from them.
>you are likely to find that some are better (in that way)
"Better" is subjective category misused in the sentence.
It's subjective, but it's not misused
If you think that living longer is better than living shorter, for example,
then certain populations will be better off in this regard than other ones
I disagree
for example the okinawa people
@everyone
they live up to the age of 115 120
There is no better.
How are you able to use that feature?
There is a measure for a certain quality that may be met to provoke a certain action.
Well, we can't argue about that
It may exist or not
I place value on some things
You don't
Is not "better". When we say "better" we ask, better for who?
But in any case, give any criterion, and the degree to which populations live up to this criterion, will be unequal
It is not better for me.
So fuck you
I value health and long life, for example
For this reason I would rather be a Scandinavian than an African American
I do not care of your value
its subjective
Stuck it into your ass
All I care
Yes?
Have you no preference between intelligence and stupidity, between health and weakness, between long life and quick death?
Well
Regardless of whether you have a preference, populations differ in ways such as these
Of course we can subdivide intelligence, and even in IQ tests, we see that populations with similar average scores, get their scores in different ways
some do well on the linguistic parts, others on the spatial parts
You talk like a bot. I already agreed with this point
Following your programm