Message from @DankMemez

Discord ID: 653021235395166210


2019-12-07 23:50:01 UTC  

listen here kneegrow

2019-12-07 23:50:08 UTC  

growing up with all this cancer

2019-12-07 23:50:16 UTC  

wahhhhh wah

2019-12-07 23:50:17 UTC  

thats you

2019-12-07 23:50:24 UTC  

nah

2019-12-07 23:50:27 UTC  

ye

2019-12-07 23:50:37 UTC  

when i was growing up the term Social Justice didnt even exist

2019-12-07 23:50:48 UTC  

internet was pretty damn free, tbh

2019-12-07 23:51:10 UTC  

sure there were lots of viruses and shit, but who cares, you could speak your mind freely

2019-12-07 23:51:29 UTC  

bruh

2019-12-07 23:51:35 UTC  

vibe check

2019-12-07 23:51:48 UTC  

the quote was from WKUK

2019-12-07 23:51:54 UTC  

jsyk

2019-12-07 23:52:21 UTC  

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/social_justice
>Social Justice
>Quote from 1932

2019-12-07 23:52:42 UTC  

yeah right, that doesnt prove shit

2019-12-07 23:52:50 UTC  

It proves that the term predates you

2019-12-07 23:52:53 UTC  

no one on the internet was using that terminology at the time

2019-12-07 23:53:01 UTC  

you know nothing lore

2019-12-07 23:53:04 UTC  

<:Doubt:588038713938804760>

2019-12-07 23:53:15 UTC  

a quote from wiktionary doesnt prove shit

2019-12-07 23:53:24 UTC  

Your anecdote doesn't prove shit

2019-12-07 23:53:36 UTC  

FACTS DNT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS

2019-12-07 23:53:39 UTC  

anyway, have your fun

2019-12-07 23:53:39 UTC  

nibba

2019-12-07 23:54:37 UTC  

social justice is a pretty easy term to use in situations. Even before its modern meaning.

2019-12-07 23:54:40 UTC  

Social

2019-12-07 23:54:45 UTC  

'and Justice

2019-12-07 23:54:49 UTC  

So yeah

2019-12-07 23:54:51 UTC  

hello

2019-12-07 23:56:47 UTC  

Dank is correct. Whatever you want to faff on about the particular words used, the concept, behavior, and activists related to it didn't exist. They identify themselves with the term "social justice" independently of any previous use of those words paired together.

Previous things that might have used the term did not have the sort of impact on culture, discussion, and so on.

2019-12-07 23:57:19 UTC  

He said the phrase itself, not the activists known today as "Social Justice Warriors" but aight

2019-12-07 23:58:10 UTC  

cryosite coming in like AACCCCKKCHUUAAALLYYY 🤓

2019-12-07 23:58:25 UTC  

`I must introduce a parenthetical protest against the abuse of the current term 'social justice'. From meaning 'justice in relations between groups or classes' it may slip into meaning a particular assumption as to what these relations should be; and a course of action might be supported because it represented the aim of 'social justice', which from the point of view of 'justice' was not just. The term 'social justice' is in danger of losing its rational content--which would be replaced by a powerful emotional charge. I believe that I have used the term myself: it should never be employed unless the user is prepared to define clearly what social justice means to him, and why he thinks it just. [footnote in T.S. Eliot's "Notes Towards the Definition of Culture," 1948]`

2019-12-08 00:01:35 UTC  

It seems the people known as "Social Justice Warriors" have been around for awhile, even though they weren't called that until recently

2019-12-08 00:02:25 UTC  

We had a name for them even before 1948. Its called communists.

2019-12-08 00:03:00 UTC  

"Social Justice" is mentioned a lot in Communist texts

2019-12-08 00:03:15 UTC  

Also the word "Progressive"

2019-12-08 00:05:36 UTC  

They are early 20th century so the idea such ideas were not in the internet is unlikely methinks

2019-12-08 00:10:22 UTC  

social justice is a euphetism