@Danacrag Don't be a Cypher. Be a Neo.

Later

The location of solar panels is irrelevant, because the force of electricity decreases by distance. Unless you want to live very close to those panels, the electricity won't be enough to power a city

@Danacrag you cry for attention everyday

Yep

Its why you are still here

I cannot be helped tho. So please ignore me

No, I refuse.

But yeah, the issue with Fukushima wasn't the reactor, it was the tsunami

@Danacrag reverse psychology

And no it wasn't safe. Outside the evacuation zone the exposure was one rad an hour

Lies, solar panels are tsunami proof.

Greetings cringelings

No one measures radiation in rads

What are you even doing

@livid_scrooge evening

And, a little reminder, America's safe standard for radiation exposure is 0.5 sieverts per year

One rad is 100 sieverts

@Hexidecimark roentgen

Is the right measurement

for most cases

@Hexidecimark that's wrong

@Reprehensibletrash no its correct

It is correct

rad is outdated

Evil has taken over the UK

if you were in the 50s then maybe

Outdated by how many years?

20 or so i think

I've been to nuclear plants, they measure in REM & miliREM, which are based on roentgen

Then convert that and tell us how high the legal exposure rate in the US is today

wait not 20

i keep thinking its 2000

50 or so years its been outdated

Also you can't technically convert freely between the two

Well it's still in the law, listed as sievert. If rads are outdated, than these laws need rewriting.

Guys

Laws always are outdated

Even bismark agrees epstein didn't killhimself lol

Get used to it

"Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." - Otto von Bismark