@Seven Proxies daily upkeep not maintenancce

Imagine thinking that using a slab of metals to create power via natural temperature differentials to boil water would be more efficient than harnessing the temperature differentials from disintegrating materials, explosions, or fire.

They're more cost, fuel, and space efficient.

Maintenance implys replacing things

Goodnyaght everynyan! Currently in Windsor, a stone's throw from the castle. Haven't died yet, I'll see if I survive this trip. Btw I'm sorry for being as black pilled as I am. I genuinely am not the happiest person even though I am privileged compared to others. I believe those who talk to me have misplaced sympathies and should give their attention to more desvering people. I really dont have much to complain about even though I complain often. Maybe this is another cry for attention, probably. I hope you are all doing well and to those that aren't I hope you will soon.

@Louis Yes it is. It's just a different word for the same thing.

@Seven Proxies you get what i mean

Anyhow, I'm off to bed now. But it's been fun and all

@Danacrag Don't be a Cypher. Be a Neo.

Later

The location of solar panels is irrelevant, because the force of electricity decreases by distance. Unless you want to live very close to those panels, the electricity won't be enough to power a city

@Danacrag you cry for attention everyday

Yep

Its why you are still here

I cannot be helped tho. So please ignore me

No, I refuse.

But yeah, the issue with Fukushima wasn't the reactor, it was the tsunami

@Danacrag reverse psychology

And no it wasn't safe. Outside the evacuation zone the exposure was one rad an hour

Lies, solar panels are tsunami proof.

Greetings cringelings

No one measures radiation in rads

What are you even doing

@livid_scrooge evening

And, a little reminder, America's safe standard for radiation exposure is 0.5 sieverts per year

One rad is 100 sieverts

@Hexidecimark roentgen

Is the right measurement

for most cases

@Hexidecimark that's wrong

@Reprehensibletrash no its correct

It is correct

rad is outdated

Evil has taken over the UK

if you were in the 50s then maybe

Outdated by how many years?

20 or so i think

I've been to nuclear plants, they measure in REM & miliREM, which are based on roentgen

Then convert that and tell us how high the legal exposure rate in the US is today

wait not 20

i keep thinking its 2000