basically atheism isnt ready to even propose a social model simply because its busy tearing down the christian one that already exists.

Popping by to make sure Addie is speaking in a polite and formal manner

wait wait hold that thought

I gotta do something real quick

thats correct

it doesnt have anything to fill it

hmmmm

becaues the position does not exist

@Riley religion is inevitable

but that doesnt mean its claims are accurate

Until I see evidence for God, I will assume that he is not existant

<:pardon:599708367245541387>

<:cringe:591181675426217995>

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝
Theists: What type of evidence would you need to shake your belief in God?
Atheists: What type of evidence would you need to start believing in God?

none

because

You're a lemming, we all know

science gay

and so is logic

I would have to be abducted by interdimensional clockwork aliens that half look like Obama

And even then I could just say the devil is trying to trick me

^

lmao idk

@Iahhel Yeah, it's a bit solipsistic isn't it? Really anything that anyone ever experiences can be reasoned away as "this is a figment of my imagination" or "demons are tricking me"

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question 🔖

- Are Religion and Science at odds or are the 2 compatible? Explain.

Of course they are an I will explain why I think so @Deleted User

they are at odds

or

the latter

I think it's very specific to a lot of different cases

And I don't think it is necessarily a yes or no, I'd say it depends quite a lot on which religion, which doctrine, and which part of science.

First of all, it's a common misconception that religion is necessarily anti-scientific or that it was created agaisnt science. No, religion is the reconnection to forces, powers and laws that exceed the human capability. Anything based on this is a religion. For one it can be their nation, for others it can be science. Yes, science can be a religion. It's treated like that by scientism and Marxism. Futhermore, even religion in the form most people think of is not created against science. No, it is about a certain lifestyle and a certain interpretation of essential for our life things using a certain system. Not everything has to observe the cells. Not everything has to observe the law of Ohm. Just because something does not view the anatomy of a body, does not make it anti-scientific. Neither is science created agaisnt religion which again, is a broad thing and I gave a clear description of it.

So, they are compatible. The whole religion-science dilemma is artificial.

Very well put!

Can be better but thanks :)

@Deleted User there is nothing in the world more anti-science than religion

Religion is based in ignorance and there is nothing more ignorant than saying 'well idk where the Earth and stuff came from, so it must have been a God"

not to mention the repeated attempts made by the religious right to force intelligent design into schools

K

i would need god himself to literally tell me i shouldnt worship him

and even then i would just say