lol as far as I know they are poor catholics.

and I would argue religion is necessary, look at western countries without it. That in itself is enough of a case for keeping religion, even if it is pragmatic and to build society.

no, its time we move on. We don't need God anymore

he has become obsolete

-> looks to the west literally falling apart and being replaced by radical islam
-> k

LMAO yea the muslims are turning western nations into theocracies

Even if this were the case, there are other ways to solve it

I mean they are simply winning on a social level, they will win given time. Atheism is just dying. Its as mauritian struggle put it a failed reproductive strategy.

The biggest issue atheism has as a social order is that its basically a vaccume. its after the the non belief, and thus has no propositions to fill the void that it produces.

basically atheism isnt ready to even propose a social model simply because its busy tearing down the christian one that already exists.

Popping by to make sure Addie is speaking in a polite and formal manner

wait wait hold that thought

I gotta do something real quick

thats correct

it doesnt have anything to fill it

hmmmm

becaues the position does not exist

@Riley religion is inevitable

but that doesnt mean its claims are accurate

Until I see evidence for God, I will assume that he is not existant

<:pardon:599708367245541387>

<:cringe:591181675426217995>

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝
Theists: What type of evidence would you need to shake your belief in God?
Atheists: What type of evidence would you need to start believing in God?

none

because

You're a lemming, we all know

science gay

and so is logic

I would have to be abducted by interdimensional clockwork aliens that half look like Obama

And even then I could just say the devil is trying to trick me

^

lmao idk

@Iahhel Yeah, it's a bit solipsistic isn't it? Really anything that anyone ever experiences can be reasoned away as "this is a figment of my imagination" or "demons are tricking me"

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question 🔖

- Are Religion and Science at odds or are the 2 compatible? Explain.

Of course they are an I will explain why I think so @Deleted User

they are at odds

or

the latter

I think it's very specific to a lot of different cases

And I don't think it is necessarily a yes or no, I'd say it depends quite a lot on which religion, which doctrine, and which part of science.

First of all, it's a common misconception that religion is necessarily anti-scientific or that it was created agaisnt science. No, religion is the reconnection to forces, powers and laws that exceed the human capability. Anything based on this is a religion. For one it can be their nation, for others it can be science. Yes, science can be a religion. It's treated like that by scientism and Marxism. Futhermore, even religion in the form most people think of is not created against science. No, it is about a certain lifestyle and a certain interpretation of essential for our life things using a certain system. Not everything has to observe the cells. Not everything has to observe the law of Ohm. Just because something does not view the anatomy of a body, does not make it anti-scientific. Neither is science created agaisnt religion which again, is a broad thing and I gave a clear description of it.

So, they are compatible. The whole religion-science dilemma is artificial.

Very well put!