Its just a modern God in the gaps

It's not an argument about the start of the universe

christians stole things from the muslims <:sniff:591452013682753536>

It's about *here and now*

o you said cosmological so

i thought thats what you meant

Read a book sometime lol

Only like 2 of the cosmological arguments regard that

you literally said "cosmological argument"

Yes?

cosmology usually references you know

space

Have you ever read a philosophical work?

lmao why would I?

logic is alright, but science tells us much more about the world around us

rather than sitting and pondering about the world, we can make observations and theories that can be tested

Science is truth preserving and relies on metaphysical assumptions that philosophers like Aristotle forged

Do you think empiricism was popular before empiricists?

Well i wouldnt think so

as there was no empiricists

So viewing science so religiously is a philosophical claim, not a brute fact

do you have evidence for God or not

that was my quesiton

View the image I posted

already did

Criticisms?

For the sake of argument, lets say there is a purely actual actualizer

How do you know it is a God?

let alone the Christian God

Well the argument is actually 50 steps

Christian God is hard to debate for ngl

...wonderful

50 steps wth

there are much simpler ways to go about this

Aquinas was big brained I'm telling you

so do you believe in original sin?

P sure aquinas took a few things from his predecessors <:smug:591181720565579807>

Of course I do Addie

if so, please tell me how that came about if genesis is fake news

Perception, the argument is actually Aristotle's yes

He just advanced it