When did i say i want to force people to switch

Competition means choice. @windmill man If we make ourselves better, we become a more attractive choice.

Nobody is forcing someone to pick one, or only one

>create social media to stop bias
>have social media without bias
OK, and now? People have the freedom to choose the one with bias if they want

Not sure what the problem is

*except for choosing between the civil war here*

>muh people will choose the better platform

no they wont

they never will

>muh i want my attention

People are not that intelligent

People want convivence

And YT is very convenient

Is convenience not a measurement of “betterness”?

No

It's not

yea

How do you measure "Betterness"

I’d argue it’s at the least a variable.

Youtube does exactly what people want it to do

Anywho, back to my shift.

Which makes it superior to ur shitty right wing news station

@DrRisen The problem occurs like this: Company makes a good platform, objectively good, once everyone is in it and finds it convienent

They wont switch off

So the company can do whatever

yea and when they do you switch

It's like a plant waiting for the fly to settle in before killing it

@windmill man People wont switch

Even if YT was objectivley bad

OK, they always have the choice to do so

And that's whats important

Are you retarded?

They cant switch

Nigga are you retarded

They cant and they wont

U dont need another 1 billion people to watch videos with you

There is no platform that is as viable for creators

as viable maybe, but there are other platforms

YT is a monopoly

"there are other platforms"

And?