if they're smaller you can still acces them and watch everything on them and share the links to that site with other people you know

@Deleted User Hey m8. I can use bribes

The Channel is going to get 100 BAT

this month

35 bucks

@21ooAB I'd like to see you try to bribe them into merging

@windmill man Watch the video fully, you cant be big without attracting regular viewers

why do you need to be big

and sites like bitchute will never catch on in the current situation because they only harbour political channels

To compete with yt

*why can’t we have nice things*

why do you need to compete with yt

why can't you let people choose to make the switch if they want

why need to decide things for people

what?

When did i say i want to force people to switch

Competition means choice. @windmill man If we make ourselves better, we become a more attractive choice.

Nobody is forcing someone to pick one, or only one

>create social media to stop bias
>have social media without bias
OK, and now? People have the freedom to choose the one with bias if they want

Not sure what the problem is

*except for choosing between the civil war here*

>muh people will choose the better platform

no they wont

they never will

>muh i want my attention

People are not that intelligent

People want convivence

And YT is very convenient

Is convenience not a measurement of “betterness”?

No

It's not

yea

How do you measure "Betterness"

I’d argue it’s at the least a variable.

Youtube does exactly what people want it to do

Anywho, back to my shift.

Which makes it superior to ur shitty right wing news station

@DrRisen The problem occurs like this: Company makes a good platform, objectively good, once everyone is in it and finds it convienent

They wont switch off

So the company can do whatever

yea and when they do you switch