Message from @DrRisen
Discord ID: 593178097147183152
why need to decide things for people
what?
When did i say i want to force people to switch
Competition means choice. @windmill man If we make ourselves better, we become a more attractive choice.
Nobody is forcing someone to pick one, or only one
>create social media to stop bias
>have social media without bias
OK, and now? People have the freedom to choose the one with bias if they want
Not sure what the problem is
*except for choosing between the civil war here*
>muh people will choose the better platform
no they wont
they never will
>muh i want my attention
People are not that intelligent
People want convivence
And YT is very convenient
Is convenience not a measurement of “betterness”?
No
It's not
yea
How do you measure "Betterness"
Youtube does exactly what people want it to do
Anywho, back to my shift.
Which makes it superior to ur shitty right wing news station
@DrRisen The problem occurs like this: Company makes a good platform, objectively good, once everyone is in it and finds it convienent
They wont switch off
So the company can do whatever
yea and when they do you switch
It's like a plant waiting for the fly to settle in before killing it
@windmill man People wont switch
Even if YT was objectivley bad
OK, they always have the choice to do so
And that's whats important
Are you retarded?
They cant switch
Nigga are you retarded
They cant and they wont
U dont need another 1 billion people to watch videos with you
There is no platform that is as viable for creators
as viable maybe, but there are other platforms
YT is a monopoly