Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 600499233644085258
according to literally every culture
yes
They only promote it up to the point diseases begin to ravage the minds of the participant tribes (i.e Papau New Guinea).
Who is in charge of our definition of what is objective moral or immoral then?
God
"God" is an arbitrary term, and thus cannot be used to define objective truth in reality.
Morality is objective
christianity is incompatible with fascism so i dont believe in a god
<:HellYeah:591182597514723345>
Raping and eating a child is objectively immoral
I don't care if some cultures do it
Morality isn't objective or subjective
yikes
In response to wiktor, sure cultures hold up universal values, but it depends on the base which influences them. An islamic civilization is very likely to view adultery (since many believe in the four wives) quite differently.There is a reason even in the argument for freedom of religion it only goes so far. Its one thing to sacrifice animals ala Santeria, but polygamy will never be acceptable in a country like the United States.
It all depends
😬
imagine putting religion below politics
Let me rephrase that. Morality can be subjective and objective, depending on the situation
i mean
below
<:lmao:591182326013100034>
Is it objectively wrong to hit someone you are in a relationship with for no reason?
no
fascism isnt just politics , its a philosiphy
<:scared:591188576859979778>
just like rape isn't objectively wrong
Yes it is
no its not
To me the answer is hitting someone you are in a relationship with is obviously wrong. Then you have cultures which believe as long as you don't bruise the wife, and the kids don't see it it is fine.
I don't care about an unlikely situation where you have to save the world by raping someone
I disagree with said cultures.
rape the system
If your pragmatic and grounded in reality, morality can be objective
Its not always clear cut
Piracy isn't objectively wrong or right.
its wrong by your standards
but like
I don't care