Let me rephrase that. Morality can be subjective and objective, depending on the situation

i dont have a religion to put above politics

i mean

below

<:lmao:591182326013100034>

Is it objectively wrong to hit someone you are in a relationship with for no reason?

no

fascism isnt just politics , its a philosiphy

<:scared:591188576859979778>

just like rape isn't objectively wrong

Yes it is

no its not

To me the answer is hitting someone you are in a relationship with is obviously wrong. Then you have cultures which believe as long as you don't bruise the wife, and the kids don't see it it is fine.

I don't care about an unlikely situation where you have to save the world by raping someone

I disagree with said cultures.

rape the system

If your pragmatic and grounded in reality, morality can be objective

Its not always clear cut

Piracy isn't objectively wrong or right.

its wrong by your standards

but like

I don't care

The rape situation sounds a bit like utilitarianism.

not objectively

Objectivity is above standards

Piracy is only wrong from a legal perspective.

Say what you will about theft, but piracy is on a whole other level, and so intertwined with government we hit a gray area.

Is raping a baby and then decapitating it objectively wrong? And by objective I mean, always wrong even if someone doesn't think so

Of course it is

of course it is wrong objectively

Hell if it weren't for pirates the U.S would have had to rely entirely on the damned Frenchmen to create a navy.

hm

what if

@Benuty I mean torrenting

objectively wrong doesn't mean literally every culture has to have moral standard

and like

there can be exceptions

but that thing would still be objectively wrong

Well torrenting is a whole other issue. At least in the west people don't really give a shit about the starving artist trope anymore.

If artists didn't get obscenely wealthy off their works I might find it wrong.

what do pirates and torrents have to do with this