Message from @Classy

Discord ID: 590039166037786624


2019-06-17 04:42:36 UTC  

**Genesis 1:16 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<16> God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars. ```

2019-06-17 04:42:43 UTC  

No

2019-06-17 04:42:49 UTC  

No one here probably likes boomers

2019-06-17 04:42:59 UTC  

Nothing can create itself

2019-06-17 04:43:12 UTC  

So either the Universe is uncreated, or something created it

2019-06-17 04:43:12 UTC  

We're all basically trash sinners and we all know it and I hope we all resent it but we are weak.

2019-06-17 04:43:15 UTC  

The Bible belt is very white but it also paradoxically is rather low in average IQ.

2019-06-17 04:43:20 UTC  

I've lived in it my whole life

2019-06-17 04:43:25 UTC  

Luckily God is a merciful God.

2019-06-17 04:43:30 UTC  

I would say the average intelligence here is somewhere around 95

2019-06-17 04:43:40 UTC  

*Und Gott machte zwei große Lichter: ein großes Licht, das den Tag regiere, und ein kleines Licht, das die Nacht regiere, dazu auch die Sterne.*
This is the type of thing I mean by mistranslation or misunderstanding

2019-06-17 04:43:46 UTC  

I'm Mensa cardholding BTW

2019-06-17 04:43:47 UTC  

Yeah and we are not even getting into the argument how how and endless void could somehow create matter

2019-06-17 04:43:52 UTC  

This is *not* able to be used to disprove god

2019-06-17 04:44:02 UTC  

>endless void
citation?

2019-06-17 04:44:08 UTC  

We have no idea what came before the Big Bang.

2019-06-17 04:44:25 UTC  

Endless void? I guess nothing would put it better

2019-06-17 04:44:42 UTC  

That's you creating a gap where it needn't be then shoehorning your god into it.

2019-06-17 04:44:49 UTC  

At least the scientific consensus is „nothing“

2019-06-17 04:44:54 UTC  

Is it really?

2019-06-17 04:44:59 UTC  

What does "nothing" mean?

2019-06-17 04:45:09 UTC  

There was an absence of matter

2019-06-17 04:45:16 UTC  

There is no consensus on the subject.

2019-06-17 04:45:20 UTC  

The big bang assumes that there was nothing before it correct ? Or am i wrong

2019-06-17 04:45:24 UTC  

One thing we know 100% FOR CERTAIN, NO DISPUTE: Scientists have been wrong 100% of the time throughout history, and they're still wrong every single week. Every week the "facts" change.

2019-06-17 04:45:41 UTC  

Well nothing except God is what i would tell you

2019-06-17 04:45:50 UTC  

I don't trust a labcoat cuck for shit

2019-06-17 04:45:53 UTC  

The point of science is to test disprove what you think you know and improve upon that

2019-06-17 04:46:01 UTC  

Well lads, I'm finna head out. @ me if you need the gadolig answer

2019-06-17 04:46:07 UTC  

Some believe that it was formed from the echoes of a larger Big Crunch from a previous iteration of the universe. Some believe that it was formed from the collision of other multiverses.

2019-06-17 04:46:21 UTC  

The issue is that science is inherently limited to the material

2019-06-17 04:46:22 UTC  

Bye Phil goodnight

2019-06-17 04:46:23 UTC  

Apologetics also don’t work, it’s hard to prove „god“ of any sort existed

2019-06-17 04:46:27 UTC  

gn

2019-06-17 04:46:39 UTC  

Believe but Jesus was real, physically, and it's been proven.

2019-06-17 04:46:39 UTC  

There was some external reason as to the formation of the universe

2019-06-17 04:46:42 UTC  

Night Phil

2019-06-17 04:46:52 UTC  

People saw Jesus nobody saw the "big bang"

2019-06-17 04:46:57 UTC  

So what Mohammad

2019-06-17 04:46:59 UTC  

I might head out in a few minutes but I'll stay for a few and argue a bit more

2019-06-17 04:47:00 UTC  

So was