Message from @Phil With Frankincense
Discord ID: 590039424658571284
Luckily God is a merciful God.
I would say the average intelligence here is somewhere around 95
*Und Gott machte zwei große Lichter: ein großes Licht, das den Tag regiere, und ein kleines Licht, das die Nacht regiere, dazu auch die Sterne.*
This is the type of thing I mean by mistranslation or misunderstanding
I'm Mensa cardholding BTW
Yeah and we are not even getting into the argument how how and endless void could somehow create matter
This is *not* able to be used to disprove god
>endless void
citation?
We have no idea what came before the Big Bang.
Endless void? I guess nothing would put it better
That's you creating a gap where it needn't be then shoehorning your god into it.
At least the scientific consensus is „nothing“
Is it really?
What does "nothing" mean?
There was an absence of matter
There is no consensus on the subject.
The big bang assumes that there was nothing before it correct ? Or am i wrong
One thing we know 100% FOR CERTAIN, NO DISPUTE: Scientists have been wrong 100% of the time throughout history, and they're still wrong every single week. Every week the "facts" change.
Well nothing except God is what i would tell you
I don't trust a labcoat cuck for shit
The point of science is to test disprove what you think you know and improve upon that
Some believe that it was formed from the echoes of a larger Big Crunch from a previous iteration of the universe. Some believe that it was formed from the collision of other multiverses.
The issue is that science is inherently limited to the material
Bye Phil goodnight
Apologetics also don’t work, it’s hard to prove „god“ of any sort existed
gn
Believe but Jesus was real, physically, and it's been proven.
There was some external reason as to the formation of the universe
Night Phil
People saw Jesus nobody saw the "big bang"
So what Mohammad
I might head out in a few minutes but I'll stay for a few and argue a bit more
So was
I'm not disregarding all other claims I'm stating one.
The problem with this retarded argument is literally anything could feasibly fit the role of this "universal creator"
And again, this plays on the assumption of the universe being causally created by a single event
We have *no true idea* what created the universe, what caused the bang, what came before it.
Time *as we know it* began at the Bang, this doesn't mean that "nothing" came before it
And cosmological "nothingness" is very different from true "nothingness"
I'll tell you what caused the bang it's gonna be God when he nukes the labcoat test tube nerds with a 0% right trackrecord
We have never seen true "nothingness" and there is good reason to believe that the quantum noise is ever-present