Message from @Notso

Discord ID: 590039674307739649


2019-06-17 04:44:59 UTC  

What does "nothing" mean?

2019-06-17 04:45:09 UTC  

There was an absence of matter

2019-06-17 04:45:16 UTC  

There is no consensus on the subject.

2019-06-17 04:45:20 UTC  

The big bang assumes that there was nothing before it correct ? Or am i wrong

2019-06-17 04:45:24 UTC  

One thing we know 100% FOR CERTAIN, NO DISPUTE: Scientists have been wrong 100% of the time throughout history, and they're still wrong every single week. Every week the "facts" change.

2019-06-17 04:45:41 UTC  

Well nothing except God is what i would tell you

2019-06-17 04:45:50 UTC  

I don't trust a labcoat cuck for shit

2019-06-17 04:45:53 UTC  

The point of science is to test disprove what you think you know and improve upon that

2019-06-17 04:46:01 UTC  

Well lads, I'm finna head out. @ me if you need the gadolig answer

2019-06-17 04:46:07 UTC  

Some believe that it was formed from the echoes of a larger Big Crunch from a previous iteration of the universe. Some believe that it was formed from the collision of other multiverses.

2019-06-17 04:46:21 UTC  

The issue is that science is inherently limited to the material

2019-06-17 04:46:22 UTC  

Bye Phil goodnight

2019-06-17 04:46:23 UTC  

Apologetics also don’t work, it’s hard to prove „god“ of any sort existed

2019-06-17 04:46:27 UTC  

gn

2019-06-17 04:46:39 UTC  

Believe but Jesus was real, physically, and it's been proven.

2019-06-17 04:46:39 UTC  

There was some external reason as to the formation of the universe

2019-06-17 04:46:42 UTC  

Night Phil

2019-06-17 04:46:52 UTC  

People saw Jesus nobody saw the "big bang"

2019-06-17 04:46:57 UTC  

So what Mohammad

2019-06-17 04:46:59 UTC  

I might head out in a few minutes but I'll stay for a few and argue a bit more

2019-06-17 04:47:00 UTC  

So was

2019-06-17 04:47:16 UTC  

I'm not disregarding all other claims I'm stating one.

2019-06-17 04:47:18 UTC  

The problem with this retarded argument is literally anything could feasibly fit the role of this "universal creator"

2019-06-17 04:47:37 UTC  

And again, this plays on the assumption of the universe being causally created by a single event

2019-06-17 04:47:57 UTC  

We have *no true idea* what created the universe, what caused the bang, what came before it.

2019-06-17 04:48:12 UTC  

Time *as we know it* began at the Bang, this doesn't mean that "nothing" came before it

2019-06-17 04:48:27 UTC  

And cosmological "nothingness" is very different from true "nothingness"

2019-06-17 04:48:57 UTC  

I'll tell you what caused the bang it's gonna be God when he nukes the labcoat test tube nerds with a 0% right trackrecord

2019-06-17 04:48:58 UTC  

We have never seen true "nothingness" and there is good reason to believe that the quantum noise is ever-present

2019-06-17 04:49:13 UTC  

What do you mean by 0% right, by the way?

2019-06-17 04:49:24 UTC  

Scientific exploration has never in human history gotten a single thing right?

2019-06-17 04:49:31 UTC  

Nope

2019-06-17 04:49:34 UTC  

And I guess your church does better?

2019-06-17 04:49:41 UTC  

Yeah they keep their story straight

2019-06-17 04:49:58 UTC  

Meanwhile the science cucks one week red wine is good for your heart next week oh it's actually really bad for your heart

2019-06-17 04:50:09 UTC  

Yeah that's why many Christians believe in evolution now

2019-06-17 04:50:19 UTC  

You yourself were using evolution to bolster your claims previously.

2019-06-17 04:50:25 UTC  

((Christians))

2019-06-17 04:50:26 UTC  

Science and the scientific method is built on being repeatedly less wrong through experimentation — and now we are a whole lot less wrong than even 25 years ago

2019-06-17 04:50:32 UTC  

Sorry i had to do that

2019-06-17 04:50:32 UTC  

Science is a good thing