Message from @Riley
Discord ID: 612860758887497728
When you have people who are pushing to actively replace the majority and silencing and deplatforming right wing points of view, and also wish to disarm them, I'd say for the long haul we leave it how it is.
I'd rather be able to defend myself than have no guns and get stabbed in my own home
Sure, disarming the country is too far. Totally agree. But what does that have to do with regulations and registration?
Well Federal registration has already been declared unconstitutional, but states can have people register firearms. I think that some regulations like background checks would be alright.
But mainly for criminal records.
@Shalopy Declarations can be sustained or overruled by a Supreme Court. There’s nothing stopping Congress from making a law and having it go through the legal process of approval.
I would say no registration, at least for quite a while. When the government gets controlled by people who want to destroy right wing ideas and people, and it will, they'd use registration to go after those people.
Like with the red flag laws, kamela harris said she'd want to take firearms away from supposed right wing extremists. Someone like her will eventually become president, and laying the groundwork for that to be easy by instituting red flag laws for people who are unstable would not be good
No registration for guns
@DrRisen stop promoting tyranny
I'm no libertarian, but right now it's not an appropriate time for any gun control
youve gotta be seriously low iq to think that mass shootings are an actual problem, legit emotional women brain
^
Apparently Stockholm is the city with the most listeners of xurious in the world
At least according to spotify
All cities in the list are leftist
Stockholm Chicago Helsinki LA London
Any fascists here able to explain why ethnicity is more valuable than ideology?
@Broken Cocaine Bars nope lol
@Shalopy God forbid we take deadly weapons away from unpredictable extremists who have violent views
Who's making the descisions and distinctions? What constitutes what? It can easily be used to hurt people.
oh yea, and allowing violent far right extemists to own semi automatic weapons wont hurt anyone
lmao they are gonna create a libtard police state
"be nice to gay people"
"We are forcing you to have an abortion because we hate babies!"
who would win
- The largest, most advanced, and most funded military in the world armed with tanks, drones, jets, and ballistic missiles
- A couple boomers armed with shotguns and AR-15s
Oh yeah because it's all actually very benign. Because mass waves of immigrants and the destruction of the family is all healthy and good. We shouldn't worry. The extent to how far everything will go is only up till what we say, we promise. It won't go further. We only take guns away from some people and totally can't be used to target people who want to challenge the status quo.
LMAO a bunch of right wing boomers with AR-15s are not going to be able to overthrow the libtard govenrment
:garfilf:
aw shit my nitro ran out
Yeah so I don't have the right to defend myself, my family and property. Okay.
nobody wants to destroy your family
sure you can
im not saying you can't have guns
Im saying
- Dangerous people shouldnt be allowed to have them
- You can't overthrow the Government
I never argued for overthrowing the government. Revolution is gay. You change things politically.
o alright
I disavow political violence for the record. I just need to be able to defend myself.
from the libtards?