Well with how things are going right now, I'd say no gun control at all

I’ll ask you to explain that point of view. @Shalopy

@Maksim Gibs National Bolshevik role

When you have people who are pushing to actively replace the majority and silencing and deplatforming right wing points of view, and also wish to disarm them, I'd say for the long haul we leave it how it is.

I'd rather be able to defend myself than have no guns and get stabbed in my own home

Sure, disarming the country is too far. Totally agree. But what does that have to do with regulations and registration?

Well Federal registration has already been declared unconstitutional, but states can have people register firearms. I think that some regulations like background checks would be alright.

But mainly for criminal records.

@Shalopy Declarations can be sustained or overruled by a Supreme Court. There’s nothing stopping Congress from making a law and having it go through the legal process of approval.

I would say no registration, at least for quite a while. When the government gets controlled by people who want to destroy right wing ideas and people, and it will, they'd use registration to go after those people.

Like with the red flag laws, kamela harris said she'd want to take firearms away from supposed right wing extremists. Someone like her will eventually become president, and laying the groundwork for that to be easy by instituting red flag laws for people who are unstable would not be good

No registration for guns

@DrRisen stop promoting tyranny

I'm no libertarian, but right now it's not an appropriate time for any gun control

youve gotta be seriously low iq to think that mass shootings are an actual problem, legit emotional women brain

^

Apparently Stockholm is the city with the most listeners of xurious in the world

At least according to spotify

All cities in the list are leftist

Stockholm Chicago Helsinki LA London

Any fascists here able to explain why ethnicity is more valuable than ideology?

@Broken Cocaine Bars nope lol

@Shalopy God forbid we take deadly weapons away from unpredictable extremists who have violent views

its IRL 1984

Who's making the descisions and distinctions? What constitutes what? It can easily be used to hurt people.

oh yea, and allowing violent far right extemists to own semi automatic weapons wont hurt anyone

lmao they are gonna create a libtard police state

"be nice to gay people"

"We are forcing you to have an abortion because we hate babies!"

@Shalopy

who would win

- The largest, most advanced, and most funded military in the world armed with tanks, drones, jets, and ballistic missiles

- A couple boomers armed with shotguns and AR-15s

Oh yeah because it's all actually very benign. Because mass waves of immigrants and the destruction of the family is all healthy and good. We shouldn't worry. The extent to how far everything will go is only up till what we say, we promise. It won't go further. We only take guns away from some people and totally can't be used to target people who want to challenge the status quo.

LMAO a bunch of right wing boomers with AR-15s are not going to be able to overthrow the libtard govenrment

:garfilf:

aw shit my nitro ran out

Yeah so I don't have the right to defend myself, my family and property. Okay.

nobody wants to destroy your family

sure you can

im not saying you can't have guns

Im saying
- Dangerous people shouldnt be allowed to have them
- You can't overthrow the Government

I never argued for overthrowing the government. Revolution is gay. You change things politically.

o alright