ffs

Dont put words in my mouth

if the indians had some more money they would have been as advanced as the west
ridiculous

oh yeh and the whole 45 trillion line is actually BS https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=1714

its literally impossible

they would have to have looted over 95% of the whole economy

Your entire argument centers around the moral point that exploitation is immoral. Both morality and exploitation are subjective terms

*gdp

@Deleted User 9.2 trillion pounds with 5% interest

https://www.quora.com/Britain-took-away-45-trillion-from-India-in-173-years-Are-Brits-and-Indians-aware-of-that

@Asdrubal

Special council Bills?

The indians were never paid

But instead defrauded

they were defrauded of over 95%?

absolutely laughable

Where did you find that pic?

@Deleted User

this vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAXPIhnQocM

Ah

I havent watched it all the way through

basically asdrubal is drinking his own marxist koolaid abd refuses to accept the impossibility of his claims

So all gold and silver used for Indian trade goes directly to London once the Raj is nationalized, this is done through special council bills printed by the British. The special council bills "paid" to the indians who sold goods were exchanged for rupees from tax revenue, money that was collected from the Indians

this is irrelevant and youre shifting goalposts now

pls stop

I'm still typing

The special council bills causes a trade surplus for India

Since no indians are being paid

All of the actual money goes to the British

And the traders make profits

https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=2091 this timestamp addresses your point

the trade surplus was not impoverishing tbh

fairly reasonable

There's no stamp

34:50 @Asdrubal

That doesnt address the special crown bills

None of the sources you have listed have

The quora article alone disproves your point

Did you read it?

Marxist mathematics at it again!