Message from @Asdrubal
Discord ID: 640298868373717042
gods youre dumb
If the British didnt rob them of trillions then they most likely would have
idk if thats even true
also money does not = tech otherwise mansa musa would have built wakanda lmao
The Indians would've done the exact same with the money
And put it into the world market
And the British had the means to develop the Indian nation better than the Indians could
@Deleted User technology didnt exist so obviously he didnt
lmao this nigga thinks that money = iq
ffs
Dont put words in my mouth
if the indians had some more money they would have been as advanced as the west
ridiculous
oh yeh and the whole 45 trillion line is actually BS https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=1714
its literally impossible
they would have to have looted over 95% of the whole economy
Your entire argument centers around the moral point that exploitation is immoral. Both morality and exploitation are subjective terms
*gdp
@Deleted User 9.2 trillion pounds with 5% interest
The indians were never paid
But instead defrauded
they were defrauded of over 95%?
absolutely laughable
Where did you find that pic?
Ah
I havent watched it all the way through
basically asdrubal is drinking his own marxist koolaid abd refuses to accept the impossibility of his claims
So all gold and silver used for Indian trade goes directly to London once the Raj is nationalized, this is done through special council bills printed by the British. The special council bills "paid" to the indians who sold goods were exchanged for rupees from tax revenue, money that was collected from the Indians
this is irrelevant and youre shifting goalposts now
pls stop
I'm still typing
The special council bills causes a trade surplus for India
Since no indians are being paid
All of the actual money goes to the British
And the traders make profits
https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=2091 this timestamp addresses your point
the trade surplus was not impoverishing tbh