this vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAXPIhnQocM

Ah

I havent watched it all the way through

basically asdrubal is drinking his own marxist koolaid abd refuses to accept the impossibility of his claims

So all gold and silver used for Indian trade goes directly to London once the Raj is nationalized, this is done through special council bills printed by the British. The special council bills "paid" to the indians who sold goods were exchanged for rupees from tax revenue, money that was collected from the Indians

this is irrelevant and youre shifting goalposts now

pls stop

I'm still typing

The special council bills causes a trade surplus for India

Since no indians are being paid

All of the actual money goes to the British

And the traders make profits

https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=2091 this timestamp addresses your point

the trade surplus was not impoverishing tbh

fairly reasonable

There's no stamp

34:50 @Asdrubal

That doesnt address the special crown bills

None of the sources you have listed have

The quora article alone disproves your point

Did you read it?

Marxist mathematics at it again!

Colonialism is immoral!!!!

!!!!!

theyre unimportant tbh

holding on to anything to say that the british were some kind of boogeyman

also
was this you?
''The special council causes a trade surplus for India''

this is your main issue with the bills isnt it?

the surplus was not that bad

The bills literally paid the Indians in tax money that was just collected from them

soo?
they benefitted from these thing either directly or indirectly

idk why this is suh a huge issue for you
seems like motivated reasoning

>the poverty rate was 70% at the end of raj rule in india

Totally beneficial

are we going back to correlation= causation?

right im going to dip out of this convo now because its getting circular now

You are kind of denying shit clearly infront of your face

Yes, but was that measured by modern poverty standards?

Shoot everywhere on India, human shit.

^