Message from @Asdrubal
Discord ID: 640295012785193011
But economically
India grew more under Britain than in any time period
Look at their GDP
Who gives you the economic means to buy machinery? @Deleted User
The workers, right?
lmao
what wage does the owner extract for organising the means of production in order to be efficient?
according to you nothing
Because the workers can mutually agree to do that themselves
lmao
indians were gonna build the railroads?
they were gonna do that any day now
gods youre dumb
If the British didnt rob them of trillions then they most likely would have
idk if thats even true
also money does not = tech otherwise mansa musa would have built wakanda lmao
The Indians would've done the exact same with the money
And put it into the world market
And the British had the means to develop the Indian nation better than the Indians could
@Deleted User technology didnt exist so obviously he didnt
lmao this nigga thinks that money = iq
ffs
if the indians had some more money they would have been as advanced as the west
ridiculous
oh yeh and the whole 45 trillion line is actually BS https://youtu.be/QAXPIhnQocM?t=1714
its literally impossible
they would have to have looted over 95% of the whole economy
Your entire argument centers around the moral point that exploitation is immoral. Both morality and exploitation are subjective terms
*gdp
@Deleted User 9.2 trillion pounds with 5% interest
Special council Bills?
The indians were never paid
But instead defrauded
they were defrauded of over 95%?
absolutely laughable
Where did you find that pic?
Ah
I havent watched it all the way through