?

people still think that the holodomor was ethnically motivated?
it was a deliberate atrocity imo but it obviously wasnt racially based

It was ethnically motivated as well

Stalin despised the Ukrainians

true but the main purpose was to try and turn the Ukrainian peasants against the kulaks and make them communist
this is why they handed out a bunch of propaganda about kulaks at the same time they were redirecting and withholding food

Yes, also that

It was racially motivated and that as well

well ethnically*

It was russifications

Yo

o

So, what theory do you guys read

game theory

@ʙɪɢ βɵʂʂ 𠄩

I don't get it

It’s called red son

This is good too

Unless you have some weird pro-Ukrainian reason for denying the Holodomor, denying it is not allowed

Being a communist makes you Antifa

@1488 Sorry that it took a while for you to get in. I’m down with the flu at the moment.

Lol me too

NazBol genocide when

@Ronald Wilson Reagan No

Nazbol, Natsoc, Strasserism, etc

are all essentially the same in economics

and to an extent in social view

real natsoc anyways, not that fake hitler-style shit

hitler style natsoc worked

and it worked well

Nazbol is fully communist

Natsoc is ment to be a different kind of sociallism that had a progressive economic system but not full on socialism

Natsoc was always meant to respect private property

unless it defied the national interest

and that is essentially defined by the leadership

hitler style was more capitalist than anything

@Maksim it wasn't pro or anti capitalist

in its words

in practice

More like a middle ground between the 2

it was very similar to the US economy during war time