North Korea does not officially refer to itself as Marxist in any way

Good, Marxism is bad

I sympathize with all nationalists. After we destroy progressive and neoliberalist globalizationism then we can sort out what is the best nationalism to go with.

National communism, civic nationalism, ethno-nationalism, theocratic nationalism, etc. The fight for national identity is a global one, after that fight let's sort out our shit. We are too few to be infighting.

Also begone thot

unironically supporting north korea?

<:_think_:378806733528760340>

Yes. It isn't anyone's business what north Korea does within its own borders. South Korean nationalists are within their rights to be prepared for aggression anyway they see fit.

It's my business if they threaten me

thats pretty ancap, nap is gay. If North Korea is being gay we should eat them.

I'm not an ancap. Far from it. I'm for using the state to protect American Workers from the savagery of globalization.

By "American Worker" I mean citizenry.

>Civic Nationalism
<:varg:521372050225627156>

Is pushing American Ideals abroad not protecting Americans?

I.e. it doesn't exist

Well I mean we need it, there is no American Nation, we have to have a fantasy to work as a country

Like Belgium, or Iran

Its the next step from Empire

How is Iran a fantasy nation? They're one of the oldest nations on Earth.

@εïз irma εïз Because of the vast number of different people's under their flag, the Persian People of old are dead, they just occupy the same geographical location

That is entirely untrue. The "Persian People" "of old" are still there, the history and tradition is still there.

It's built on Islamic identity post-caliphate for sure, but in no way are Iranians severed from the pre-Islamic Iranian history.

And Iran is very much Persian dominated, that would be as dumb as saying Spain is not a real nation because at one point they were Celtic and they have regionalism in Galicia and Catalonia.

And it's not like there was ever any coherent Persian people. Iran has been conquered and settled multiple times.

I mean a Nation is *a group of people united by common descent, history, race, ethnicity, culture, religion, or language, inhabiting a particular country or geographic territory*.
So the US isn't a Nation today if compared to this definition.
It doesn't have a unifying race (let alone ethnicity), culture, language, or religion.
It used to (White Anglo Saxon Protestants) but as time moved on and laws were added/changed, it is no longer a nation.

Granted a number of modern states could be labeled as a non nation like the US.

America was never good because Anglos are scum and Protestants are brainlets.

Anglos are God's true chosen people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism

(((anglos)))

^

We are the chosen people

goyim

American Nation exists as a state of ideas or civics. Some like to call it cultural nationalism not unlike Rome. Many races religions ethnicities but one culture. A monoculture.

otter btfo'd for all time

religions are culture

Religions are part of culture.

Not the whole.

America doesn't have that either.
The closest America had to a unifying culture is the *Frontier Spirit* or in laymans terms, Libertarianism

Rome was not really culturally nationalist, most areas of the empire were nominally subservient to the Roman pantheon (the requirement for being under Roman protection) while it was the landed gentry who maintained control over people who couldn't care less because the only thing they ever knew was tribal allegiances.

Yes, you admitted to your mistake though, which makes it weird