You asked the question rhetorically because you foolishly thought the obvious answer will support your belief. It didn't.

TL;DR

how did i move the goal posts
answering with the most obvious kosher approved narrative answer is a cop out
if you gave me a better answer than cold kosher takes then i might agree with you
lol "let me post a meme simplifying a complex situation and set it up as a straw man, that'll surely own the stormfag"

Calling answers you disagree with "kosher" is not a substitute for a coherent argument.

no, i'm just saying going with the whole mustache man bad muh holocaust narrative is a cop out

Not even mentioned the Holocaust (save the meme, but I used it as a generalization of my points that didn't involve the Holocaust).
At the very least, ethics aside, mustache man stupid.

ok.
we can all agree hitler made mistakes
i think we can also all agree that the anglos and the US are evil lol

That is, at the very best, a silly and thoughtless way to put it.

At the very worst, it is disingenuous.

how lol
i'm talking generally, throughout history

I would rather not steer this discussion into ethics territory, since that is a whole another topic.

Do you agree that Hilter made it extremely hard for UK and USSR to be pro-Nazi or even neutral? If not, explain your reasons.

(We'll omit US because Pearl Harbour is stupid Japanese Emperor fault)

Japan

was unlicky

for the USSR, they were going to attack germany anyways, since they saw fascism as an enemy to communism and wanted to crush it
for the UK, i think they were given plenty of chances to offer the olive branch, but denied to. its very hard to make friends when the press from the US to the UK lies about you.
he could've crushed the UK forces when they were attempting to cross the bay to the UK, but i don't think hitler truly wanted war with the UK,
even Churchill himself said that "Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
so churchill had ulterior motives to go to war with germany

Germany couldn’t have crushed the British at Dunkirk lol

yeah, thats what i mean

The Wehrmacht was halted for a reason, the troops were extremely tired from constant pushing and the Germans feared that if they kept pushing they would face a British counterattack which was possible

There were also German attacks on the salient but because of the sacrifice of valiant French soldiers he BEF has enough time to escape

mabe, but even then hitler really didn't want to go to war with the UK

>USSR would have attacked them anyway
The majority of historians disagree, since at the time the Soviet army was throughoutly unprepared for said attack. The majority of war preparations (excepting the Winter War and the Poland partition with germany) were of a defencive nature.

sooner or later attacked i mean

Weird how USSR didn't attack the US, if sooner or later the Cold War would happen.

And even so, Hilter attacked first. So if he got himself utterly destroyed, it's his fault, not USSR's

well of course, the USSR didn't attack, the US had nukes and so did they
sure hitler fucked up
but i still think at some point that the USSR would've attacked the germans since they had to crush fascism so they could spread communism

As for the "olive branch" that UK could have taken,
1. see the meme above
2. see the political term "appeasement"
3. "Not wanting to get conquered sooner or later" is an ulteriour motive
4. Following your logic, UK was completely right in atracking Germany.

>well of course the USSR didn't attack
Before the nuclear weapons, that is.
>Sure Hilter screwed up
I am glad you agree.

*listens to the sound of the cicadas*

**LOOK AT ALL THESE NYOOZ BOII**

No seriously, check this one out

France: Anti-Semitic Incidents Up 73 Percent in 2018

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/breitbart/~3/jWsVt_nhHFA/

isnt that just because there are more muslims?

antisemite term being hijacked by jews once again

>antisemite term being hijacked by Jews
Fokn wut

Who else is gonna use it nig

well jews obviously

muslims are the ones being attacked here but jews are going to act like the victims

Not according to the shit you linked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Solov